Powell

Armando Rodriguez v. Patrick J. Powell, et al

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20252:25-cv-00817California760 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARMANDO RODRIGUEZ, No. 2:25-cv-0817-DJC-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER and PATRICK J. POWELL, et al, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding in pro se. Plaintiff filed a complaint, a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), and a motion for a temporary restraining order on March 12, 2025. ECF Nos. 1, 2, 3. On April 4, 2025, the undersigned granted plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed IFP, recommended to the district judge that plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order be denied, and recommended that the complaint be rejected for service pursuant to the screening process that accompanies IFP status, with leave to amend. ECF No. 4. The Findings and Recommendations were adopted on May 27, 2025. ECF No. 6. Plaintiff sought and was granted an extension of time to file an amended complaint. ECF Nos. 7, 8. On July 31, 2025, plaintiff filed a notice of updated address and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.