Jeremy Holland v. Sharda D. Patel, et al.
Trial Court Opinion
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8 JEREMY HOLLAND CASE NO: 2:25−cv−08827−FMO−PVC Plaintiff(s), v.
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
12 SHARDA D. PATEL , et al. WITHOUT PREJUDICE 13 Defendant(s). 15 16 17 Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, 18 IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 30 days, to re-open the 20 action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction 21 over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure 22 to re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline 23 set forth above shall be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of the 24 action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 25 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962). 26 27