1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTON IAGOUNOV, No. 2:25-cv-1288 AC P 12 Petitioner,

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

13 v. RECOMMENDATIONS 14 U.S. DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN

DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA,

15 Respondent. 16

17 By order filed May 12, 2025, petitioner was ordered to file a completed in forma pauperis 18 application using the court’s form and a certified copy of his prison trust account statement and 19 was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be 20 dismissed. ECF No. 9. After petitioner failed to file a completed application or pay the fee, he 21 was given an additional twenty-one days to comply and warned that failure to comply would 22 result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without further warning. ECF No. 10. 23 The twenty-one-day period has long expired, and petitioner has not filed an application to proceed 24 in forma pauperis, paid the filing fee, or otherwise responded to the court’s orders. 25 Moreover, although it appears from the file that petitioner’s copy of the last court order 26 directing petitioner to file a completed application or pay the fee was returned, petitioner was re- 27 served with the court’s last order at his updated address on August 4, 2025. The re-served order 28 1 | was not returned as undeliverable. Despite this, he has not responded to this court’s orders. 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign 3 || adistrict judge to this case; and 4 IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 5 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 6 || assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days 7 || after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written 8 | objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 9 || Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections 10 || within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. 11 } Yist, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 12 | DATED: October 8, 2025 ~ Cttt0 Lhar—e_ 3 ALLISONCLAIRE. 14 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28