CDCR

John W. Williams v. CDCR, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20252:25-cv-02026California1,208 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN W. WILLIAMS, No. 2:25-cv-2026 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CDCR, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil action. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. A review of court records reveals that it has been determined that plaintiff has “struck out” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that conclusion was reached before this action was filed. Williams v. Patterson, 2:22-cv-1083 DAD CKD P, ECF Nos. 9 & 13. However, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), a plaintiff can still proceed in forma pauperis if the plaintiff alleges he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. The court finds that plaintiff’s allegations concerning his conditions of confinement at Mule Creek State Prison satisfy the “three strikes” exception. Therefore, plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.