Miranda

Jonathan Miranda, et al. v. Palo Alto Unified School District, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20255:25-cv-06745California1,058 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JONATHAN MIRANDA, et al., Case No. 25-cv-06745-EKL

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

PALO ALTO UNIFIED SCHOOL Re: Dkt. No. 7 DISTRICT, et al., 11 Defendants.

12 Plaintiffs Jonathan and Sarah Miranda bring this action against the Palo Alto Unified School District (“Palo Alto”) and the California Office of Administrative Hearings (“OAH”) under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”) on behalf of their son, J.M. (“Student”). Now before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction seeking a “stay put” order. Mot. for Prelim. Inj., ECF No. 7 (“Motion”). Plaintiffs ask the Court to order Palo Alto “to fund Hope Technology as Student’s stay put placement” during the pendency of this litigation. Id. at 1. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs’ motion is DENIED. “A motion for stay put functions as an ‘automatic’ preliminary injunction, meaning that the moving party need not show the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.