Valenta

Carol Valenta and Henry Vazquez, individually, and on behalf of all other similarly situated v. Naked Whey, Inc., d/b/a Naked Nutrition

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20253:25-cv-01543California3,735 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CAROL VALENTA and HENRY Case No.: 25-cv-1543-RSH-DEB VAZQUEZ, individually, and on behalf of 12 all other similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING IN PART Plaintiffs,

AND DENYING IN PART

v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS NAKED WHEY, INC., d/b/a NAKED NUTRITION, [ECF No. 7] Defendant. 18 Pending before the Court is a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Class Action Complaint, filed by defendant Naked Whey, Inc., dba Naked Nutrition, ECF No. 7. As set forth below, Defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. I. BACKGROUND On June 17, 2025, Plaintiffs filed this putative class action against Defendant. ECF No. 1. On June 30, 2025, Plaintiffs amended their complaint as of right. ECF No. 3. On August 19, 2025, pursuant to a stipulation, Plaintiffs filed their Second Amended Class Action Complaint (the “SAC”), their operative…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.