Misheal Daniell McCoy v. FCA US, LLC, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20252:25-cv-08028California1,952 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On March 21, 2025, Plaintiff filed a Complaint against FCA and Champion CDJRF in Los Angeles County Superior Court. In the First Amended Complaint filed on July 24, 2025, Plaintiff alleges that, on or about September 12, 2018, he leased a 2019 RAM 1500 (“Subject Vehicle”) manufactured and/or distributed by FCA. Plaintiff subsequently exercised the purchase option in the lease. Plaintiff alleges that he experienced various defects in the Subject Vehicle, including but not limited to misfires, rough idle, stalling, loss of power, failure of the stop/start feature, oil leak, failure to start, coolant leak, check engine light, radio/infotainment screen/reverse camera malfunction, slipping in gear, and failure of USB ports. Plaintiff alleges that he presented the Subject Vehicle to authorized repair facilities on multiple occasions but that he continued to experience symptoms of the defects after the repairs. Plaintiff alleges causes of action for: (1) violation of Subdivision (D) of California Civil Code Section 1793.2; (2) violation of Subdivision (B) of California Civil Code Section 1793.2; (3) violation of Subdivision (A)(3) of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.