Stacey Lee, et al. v. M. Power Auto Group

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20255:25-cv-02565California585 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 5:25-cv-02565-SSS-MARx Date: November 19, 2025 Title Stacey Lee, et al. v. M. Power Auto Group

Present: The Honorable: SUNSHINE S. SYKES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Irene Vazquez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendant: None Present None Present

Proceedings (In Chambers): Order Dismissing Action Without Prejudice

On September 29, 2025, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint and a Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP request”). [Dkts. 1-2]. Plaintiffs alleged violations of the Truth in Lending Act. [Dkt. 1].

On October 15, 2025, the Court postponed a ruling on the IFP request and ordered Plaintiffs to provide more information within 30 days. [Dkt. 7]. The Court ordered Plaintiffs to file completed IFP requests or, in the alternative, pay the filing fee. Id. The Court also ordered Plaintiffs to file an Amended Complaint to explain what basis they had for equitable tolling of the statute of limitations. Id. The court warned Plaintiffs that the failure to comply with the order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.