Hightower

In re: Telescopes Antitrust Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20255:20-cv-03639California2,995 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 9 IN RE: TELESCOPES ANTITRUST Case No. 5:20-cv-03639-EJD

LITIGATION

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

MOTION FOR APPEAL BOND;

DENYING MOTION FOR

PROTECTIVE ORDER

13 Re: Dkt. No. 429, 432

Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs (“IPPs”) move for the Court to impose an appeal bond on four pro se objectors to the class action Settlement Agreement. Mot., ECF No. 429. This motion is fully briefed, including supplemental briefing requested and reviewed by the Court. Zhen Opp’n, ECF No. 438; Luna Opp’n, ECF No. 441; Barnes Opp’n, ECF No. 442; Reply, ECF No. 443; IPPs Supp. Brief, ECF No. 454; Zhen Supp. Brief, ECF No. 456. The Court held a virtual hearing on August 14, 2025, and heard oral arguments from IPPs and one objector, Pat Zhen. ECF No. 451. No other objector appeared. Id. Also before the Court is Zhen’s related motion for a protective order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.