Anthony Vineyards v. UPL NA Inc., et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 9, 20251:20-cv-00506California1,140 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY VINEYARDS, Case No. 1:20-cv-00506-JLT-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER ON THIRD STIPULATION v. AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER

AS MODIFIED

UPL NA INC., et al., (Doc. 116) Defendants. 16 Pending before the Court is the parties’ third stipulated request to amend the scheduling order, filed on October 8, 2025. (Doc. 116). Background In an earlier stipulated request to extend case management dates filed approximately one month ago, the parties represented to the Court that Plaintiff and Defendant Nutrien “agreed to coordinate the scheduling of various depositions and an inspection of Plaintiff’s premises in early October[,]” (Doc. 114 at 3) (emphasis added). The parties now explain that, despite their efforts in doing so, they are unable to complete depositions in early-October as originally planned. (Doc. 116 at 4). The parties represent that, following the Court’s grant of their second stipulated request 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.