(PC)George

Richard George v. Cisneros, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 9, 20251:21-cv-00319California2,954 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD GEORGE, Case No.: 1:21-cv-00319-KES- BAM (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO

DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO

v. STATE A CLAIM CISNEROS, et al., (ECF No. 26) Defendants. FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 16 Plaintiff Richard George (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case was recently reassigned to the undersigned. Defendants filed a Request for Screening of the Second Amended Complaint on October 7, 2025. (ECF No. 27.) Plaintiff’s second amended complaint is currently before the Court for screening. (ECF No. 26.) I. Screening Requirement and Standard The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity and/or against an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.