Paudel

Samir PAUDEL v. Kristi NOEM, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20253:25-cv-03174California772 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Samir PAUDEL, Case No.: 25-cv-3174-AGS-BLM

Petitioner,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. APPOINT COUNSEL (ECF 2) AND

REQUIRING RESPONSE

Kristi NOEM, et al., Respondents.

Petitioner Samir Paudel requests appointed counsel and emergency injunctive relief in support of his habeas corpus petition. (See ECF 2, 3); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (habeas corpus). For the reasons below, the Court will grant the motion to appoint counsel and order a response to the petition and to the injunctive-relief request. APPOINTED COUNSEL Courts may appoint an attorney for an “impoverished habeas petitioner” when “the interests of justice so require.” Bashor v. Risley, 730 F.2d 1228, 1234 (9th Cir. 1984) (cleaned up); see also 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B). In this assessment, courts evaluate a petitioner’s (a) “likelihood of success on the merits” and (b) “ability . . . to articulate his claims pro se in light …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.