Mandy Pollack v. Yonas Seyoum Alemu

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20252:25-cv-06068California263 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL

Case No. 2:25-cv-06068-SPG-JPR Date November 20, 2025 Title Mandy Pollack v. Yonas Seyoum Alemu

ee Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

—CRPC GOMEZ Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present

Proceeding: (INCHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE On October 30, 2025, the Court held a Status Conference, in which it ordered the parties to meet and confer and file a joint Rule 26(f) report and worksheet, in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f), no later than November 12, 2025. (ECF No. 22). The parties have not filed a report by the November 12, 2025, deadline. The Court enjoys the inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion. See, e.g., Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629 (1962) (“The authority of a federal trial court to dismiss a plaintiff's action with prejudice because of his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.