Tarverdiyeva

Rahila Tarverdiyeva, on behalf of herself, and Vijay Tandon, as permissive joinder v. Coinbase, Inc., Coinbase Global, Inc., Phillip Martin, and Matthew Muller

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20253:22-cv-05468California1,674 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAHILA TARVERDIYEVA, on behalf of herself, and VIJAY TANDON, as permissive joinder, No. C 22-05468 WHA

Plaintiffs,

v.

ORDER DENYING SECOND

MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT

COINBASE, INC., COINBASE GLOBAL, INC., PHILLIP MARTIN, and MATTHEW MULLER, Defendants.

17 INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs’ claims involving cryptocurrency were dismissed for res judicata three years ago. Plaintiffs’ motion to vacate that judgment was denied two years ago. Plaintiffs’ appeal of that denial resulted in an affirmance one year ago. Now, plaintiffs again move to vacate judgment. STATEMENT Plaintiff Rahila Tarverdiyeva has long alleged that Coinbase took cash and cryptocurrency from her, and Coinbase has long asserted that such claims must be arbitrated. In July 2021, Tarverdiyeva brought suit in the Middle District of Florida. Coinbase moved to arbitrate. The motion was granted and the federal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.