Anisetty

Sathish Anisetty v. SSA Commissioner

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20253:24-cv-00306California1,467 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SATHISH ANISETTY, Case No. 24-cv-00306-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. ATTORNEY’S FEES

SSA COMMISSIONER, Re: Dkt. No. 29 Defendant.

15 I. INTRODUCTION After Plaintiff Sathish Anisetty brought this case and an earlier-filed related case (Anisetty v. Kijakazi, 3:20-cv-05575-TSH) for review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision to deny benefits, the Court remanded the case, and the Commissioner subsequently issued a decision in Plaintiff’s favor. Plaintiff’s attorney, Josephine Gerrard, now seeks an additional $16,037 in attorney’s fees under section 206(b) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). ECF No. 29. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the motion. II. BACKGROUND Plaintiff brought these actions for judicial review under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On January 21, 2022, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.