Fernando Gastelum v. J.K.B. Brothers Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20255:25-cv-02749California1,180 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. 5:25-cv-02749-SSS-SSCx Date November 20, 2025 Title Fernando Gastelum v. J.K.B. Brothers Inc.

Present: The Honorable SUNSHINE S. SYKES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Irene Vazquez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION On October 16, 2025, Plaintiff Fernando Gastelum filed a Complaint. [“Complaint,” Dkt. No. 1]. The Complaint asserts a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”). [See id.] On October 30, 2025, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his state law claim by November 7, 2025. [See “OSC,” Dkt. No. 10]. Plaintiff filed a response on November 7, 2025. [“Response,” Dkt. No. 11].

In the OSC, the Court specifically ordered…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.