Dmytro Ivanov v. Alejandro N. Mayorkas, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20258:25-cv-00007California735 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 DMYTRO IVANOV, Case No. 8:25-00007 ADS i Plaintiff, c

v. ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND

ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, et al., COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS Defendants. 15 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION On January 2, 2025, Plaintiff filed this action seeking mandamus relief in relation to his immigration application. (Dkt. No. 1.) Since then, the case has made no substantive progress. The Court issued an OSC Re Dismissal For Lack of Prosecution. (Dkt. No. 23.) In response, Plaintiff filed a Motion for 60-day Stay (Dkt. No. 24.) The Court denied the Motion for 60-day Stay and ordered Plaintiff to file a Local Rule compliant proof of service and a substitution of counsel form by no later than October 17, 2025 (the “Order”). (Dkt. No. 25.) To date, Plaintiff has not complied with or filed any response to the Order. II. DISCUSSION Dismissal of this action is warranted due to Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute the case…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.