Corvera

Esmerling L. Bahena v. S. Corvera

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 9, 20252:23-cv-02580California1,979 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ESMELING L. BAHENA, No. 2:23-cv-2580-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER S. CORVERA, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendant’s motion to compel (ECF No. 32) and plaintiff’s motion to modify the scheduling order for discovery purposes (ECF No. 34) are before the court. For the following reasons, defendant’s motion to compel is granted in part. Plaintiff’s motion to modify the scheduling order is denied. Plaintiff must serve outstanding discovery responses and amended discovery responses as set forth below within 30 days of the date of this order. I. Background Plaintiff initiated this action with a complaint filed on November 8, 2023. (ECF No. 1.) The court screened the complaint and found it stated a claim against defendant Corvera under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff elected…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.