Vu

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GIANG VU, Case No. 25-cv-08758-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMSISAL v. Re: Dkt. No.

SANTA CLARA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Plaintiff has filed a pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. His complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is now before the Court for review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate order. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review Plaintiff appears to be a civil detainee. See generally Dkt. No. 1. Because he is proceeding in forma pauperis, his complaint is subject to screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Under § 1915(e)(2)(B), the court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” “fail[ ] to state a claim upon which relief may be granted,” or “seek[ ] monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from…