Michael C. Warnken v. County of Solano, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 9, 20252:24-cv-01813California568 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL C. WARNKEN, Case No. 2:24-cv-01813-DJC-CSK PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE TO

COUNTY OF SOLANO, et al., PROSECUTE Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Michael C. Warnken is appearing in this action without counsel.1 The undersigned issued findings and recommendations on June 24, 2025, recommending that Defendants County of Solano and John Vasquez’s motion to dismiss be granted and Plaintiff be given leave to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 12.) The undersigned also recommended denying Defendants’ motion to strike as moot and dismissing the Doe Defendants. Id. On August 18, 2025, the District Judge adopted the findings and recommendations in full, granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss and granting Plaintiff twenty-one days to file an amended complaint, and denying Defendants’ motion to strike as moot and dismissing the Doe Defendants. (ECF No. 18.) Plaintiff was warned that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.