Bumb
Timothy Bumb v. Steven Gobin
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TIMOTHY BUMB, Case No. 25-cv-04729-SVK
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS
STEVEN GOBIN, Re: Dkt. No. 9 Defendant.
Before the Court is Defendant Steven Gobin’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Timothy Bumb’s Complaint for failure to state a claim. Dkt. 9 (the “Motion”). The Court finds the Motion suitable for determination without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). Having reviewed the Parties’ submissions,1 the relevant law and the record in this action, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the Motion. I. BACKGROUND For the purposes of resolving the Motion, the Court takes the factual allegations of the Complaint as true. See Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 519 F.3d 1025, 1031 (9th Cir. 2008) (courts generally “accept factual allegations in the complaint as true and construe the pleadings in the light most favorable to the nonmoving…