W

M. W., et al. v. GARDNER FAMILY HEALTH NETWORK, INC, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20255:25-cv-05823California1,781 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 M. W., et al., Case No. 25-cv-05823-SVK

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING FEDERAL

v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

DISMISS; SUA SPONTE REMANDING

GARDNER FAMILY HEALTH THE ACTION TO STATE COURT NETWORK, INC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 6 Defendants. 12 Before the Court is Defendant Gardner Family Health Network, Inc.’s (originally sued under the name Gardner Health Services, and referred to herein as “Gardner”)1 Motion to Dismiss the Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, based on Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Dkt. 6 (the “Motion”). The Court finds the Motion suitable for determination without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). Having reviewed the Parties’ submissions, the relevant law and the record in this action, the Court GRANTS the Motion and, because the Court consequently lacks subject matter jurisdiction to hear this matter, sua sponte REMANDS the case to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.