Riley

Michael Riley v. Amazon.com Services LLC, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20255:25-cv-07204California1,693 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 MICHAEL RILEY, Case No. 5:25-cv-07204-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO REMAND

AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC, et al., [Re: ECF No. 11] Defendants.

12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Michael Riley’s motion to remand for lack of diversity jurisdiction. ECF No. 11 (“Mot.”); see also ECF No. 13 (“Reply”). Defendant Amazon.com Services LLC (“Amazon”) opposes the motion. See ECF No. 12 (“Opp.”). The motion is suitable for resolution without oral argument; the Court VACATES the hearing set for January 29, 2026. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons below, the motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND Mr. Riley filed a complaint in Santa Clara County Superior Court for product liability and negligence on August 5, 2025. ECF No. 1-1 (“Compl.”). The complaint alleges damages consisting of past and future medical expenses, wage loss, loss of earning capacity,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.