Fletcher Sherman Legardy v. Sunrise Mall Owner Group, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FLETCHER SHERMAN LEGARDY, No. 2:25-cv-2513 DJC AC PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SUNRISE MALL OWNER GROUP, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and has paid the filing fee. The action was accordingly referred to the undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). On September 22, 2025, the court issued an order explaining that federal subject matter jurisdiction was not apparent from the contents of the complaint and ordering plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. ECF No. 4. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to timely respond would result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff has not responded or taken any other action to prosecute this case. For the reasons set forth in the court’s prior order at ECF…