Noe Hernandez v. Raymond Madden, Warden
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
NOE HERNANDEZ, Case No. CV 20-4730-MWF (RAO)
Petitioner
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT
v. AND RECOMMENDATION OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, JUDGE; GRANTING
CERTIFICATE OF
Respondent. APPEALABILITY 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition (“FAP,” Docket No. 18), Respondent’s Answer to the FAP (“Answer”; Docket No. 32), the Traverse (Docket No. 38), Petitioner’s Supplemental Brief on Claim One of the FAP (Docket No. 51), Respondent’s Response to Petitioner’s Supplemental Brief (Docket No. 55), Petitioner’s Offer of Proof (Docket No. 76), the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”; Docket No. 79); Petitioner’s Objections to the Report (“Objections”; Docket No. 81); Respondent’s Response to the Objections (“Response”; Docket No. 86), and the other relevant records on file. The Court has conducted a de novo…