Noe Hernandez v. Raymond Madden, Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20252:20-cv-04730California950 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NOE HERNANDEZ, Case No. CV 20-4730-MWF (RAO)

Petitioner

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT

v. AND RECOMMENDATION OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, JUDGE; GRANTING

CERTIFICATE OF

Respondent. APPEALABILITY 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition (“FAP,” Docket No. 18), Respondent’s Answer to the FAP (“Answer”; Docket No. 32), the Traverse (Docket No. 38), Petitioner’s Supplemental Brief on Claim One of the FAP (Docket No. 51), Respondent’s Response to Petitioner’s Supplemental Brief (Docket No. 55), Petitioner’s Offer of Proof (Docket No. 76), the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”; Docket No. 79); Petitioner’s Objections to the Report (“Objections”; Docket No. 81); Respondent’s Response to the Objections (“Response”; Docket No. 86), and the other relevant records on file. The Court has conducted a de novo…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.