Howell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FELICITY DOMINGUEZ HOWELL, Case No.: 23cv2125-LL-MSB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

vs. MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND [ECF No. 22]; CAMP PENDLETON; et al.,

Defendants. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO STRIKE

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

DISMISS [ECF No. 35];

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED

20 COMPLAINT [ECF No. 34]

23 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 22. Plaintiff, 24 proceeding pro se, filed an Opposition [ECF No. 33] and a Motion to Rule Without Reply 25 and to Strike Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 35]. The Court finds this matter 26 suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Federal 27 Rule of Civil procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons stated below, 28 the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion…