Cojocaru

Radu Cojocaru v. Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 24, 20253:24-cv-01770California3,149 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RADU COJOCARU, an Individual, Case No.: 3:24-cv-01770-W-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN-PART AND

v. DENYING IN-PART DEFENDANT’S

EX PARTE MOTION FOR

MERCK SHARP & DOHME LLC,

RECONSIDERATION RE 37 ORDER

Defendant. [DKT. NO. 42] 16 Before the Court is defendant’s Ex Parte Motion for Reconsideration re 37 Order (the “Ex Parte Motion”). Dkt. No. 42. The Court received the parties’ Joint Supplemental Briefing Regarding Defendant’s Ex Parte Motion for Reconsideration (“Joint Briefing”) on October 24, 2025. Dkt. No. 63. The disputes relating to all documents at-issue in the Ex Parte Motion were either resolved informally by the parties’ meet and confer efforts or by the present Order. I. Background a. Defendant’s Ex Parte Motion The subject of defendant’s Ex Parte Motion [Dkt. No. 42] is the Court’s June 30, 2025, Order re Joint Discovery Statement (the “June 30 Order”) [Dkt. No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.