Brooke
Theresa Brooke v. Radhika-Shyam Incorporated, a California Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THERESA BROOKE, Case No.: 3:25-cv-00202-JAH-JLB
Plaintiff,
ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO
v. FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING
RADHIKA-SHYAM INCORPORATED, [ECF No. 19] a California Corporation, 15 Defendant.
17 Pending before the Court is Defendant Radhika-Shyam Inc.’s (“Defendant”) motion 18 to dismiss. ECF No. 14 (“Motion” or “Mot.”). Plaintiff Theresa Brooke (“Plaintiff”) 19 opposes the motion. ECF No. 15 (“Opposition” or “Opp.”). Defendant has filed its reply. 20 ECF No. 18 (“Reply”). Plaintiff’s complaint raises two claims against the Defendant under 21 the American with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the Unruh Act. See ECF No. 1 22 (“Complaint” or “Compl.”). 23 On October 23, 2025, Plaintiff’s attorney filed a statement of the Plaintiff’s death 24 and indicated that her estate will be substituted to prosecute the above-entitled civil matter. 25 ECF No. 19. The Court HEREBY ORDERS the parties to file supplemental briefing on 26 the pending Motion to Dismiss…