Columbus Bingham IV v. Padres, L.P.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20253:25-cv-01199California5,641 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 COLUMBUS BINGHAM IV, Case No. 25-cv-01199-BAS-DEB

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO REMAND TO

PADRES, L.P., STATE COURT (ECF No. 7); Defendant. AND

18 (2) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION (ECF No. 4)

Presently before the Court are Plaintiff Columbus Bingham IV’s (“Plaintiff”) motion to remand the action to state court (ECF No. 7) and Defendant Padres, L.P.’s (“Defendant”) motion to compel arbitration (ECF No. 4). For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to remand the action to state court (ECF No. 7), and DENIES Defendant’s motion to compel arbitration (ECF No. 4). I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff is an aggrieved employee of Defendant, and is a member of a worker’s union who entered into collective bargaining agreements with Defendant on Plaintiff’s behalf. Plaintiff has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.