Harris

David D. Harris v. Nurse Richmond; Dr. Blaisdell

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20253:25-cv-01574California2,790 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID D. HARRIS, Case No.: 25-cv-1574-BAS-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

vs. (1) VACATING JUDGMENT AND NURSE RICHMOND; DR. BLAISDELL,

REOPENING CASE;

Defendants. (2) GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS; AND

18 (3) DISMISSING COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) & 1915A(b) 20 21 22 On June 13, 2025, pro se Plaintiff David D. Harris, a state inmate incarcerated at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) in San Diego, California filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) On July 11, 2025, the Court denied the IFP motion because it was not accompanied by a certified trust account statement. (ECF No. 3.) The Court nevertheless granted Plaintiff additional time to pay the filing fee or submit a certified trust account…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.