Albert Lee Jones v. D. Patterson, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20255:25-cv-02912California2,627 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALBERT LEE JONES, Case No. ED CV 25-2912-RGK(E)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

v. WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

D. PATTERSON, ET AL.,

15 Defendants.

17 For the reasons discussed below, the Complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A. 20 BACKGROUND 22 Plaintiff, a state prisoner currently confined at the West Valley Detention Center (“WVDC”), filed this civil rights action on October 27, 2025. The Complaint identifies the Defendants as: Sergeant D. Patton; Deputy C. Davis; Deputy Forbes; Deputy Hayden; and Does 1 through 20. The Court granted Plaintiff in forma pauperis status on 27 A plaintiff may name a fictitious defendant in his or her complaint if the plaintiff does not know the true identity of the defendant prior to the filing of the complaint. November 4, 2025. 2 SUMMARY OF PLAINTIFF’S ALLEGATIONS 4 The Complaint alleges:…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.