Valdez
Samuel Samson Guzman v. R. Valdez, M. Jimenez, V. Cuevas, Samantha Kutney and Bertha Lopez
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAMUEL SAMSON GUZMAN,, Case No. 1:21-cv-00621-KES-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S DUE PROCESS
v. CLAIM
R. VALDEZ, M. JIMENEZ, V. CUEVAS, (Doc. No. 21) SAMANTHA KUTNEY and BERTHA LOPEZ, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO CORRECT
CAPTION
Defendants.
FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE
17 Plaintiff Samuel Samson Guzman is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis on his Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 17). On September 22, 2025 the district judge adopted in part and declined in part the Findings and Recommendations issued by the undersigned. (Doc. No. 21). In its June 3, 2024 Findings and Recommendations, the undersigned had found that the TAC failed to state a cognizable claim under the First, Eighth, or Fourteenth Amendments and recommended that Plaintiff’s TAC be dismissed without further leave to amend. (Doc.…