Rodolfo Jose Pacheco Sena, A#221042111 v. Department of Homeland Security, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20253:25-cv-03275California541 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RODOLFO JOSE PACHECO SENA, Case No.: 25-cv-3275-CAB-MSB

A#221042111,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

Petitioner, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS v. 14 [Doc. No. 2]

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND

15 SECURITY, et al., 16 Respondents.

18 Petitioner Rodolfo Jose Pacheco Sena (“Petitioner”), an immigration detainee 19 housed at the Otay Mesa Detention Center proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for Writ of 20 Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. [Doc. No. 1.] Petitioner also filed a motion 21 to proceed in forma pauperis. [Doc. No. 2.] Upon review, Petitioner’s request to proceed 22 in forma pauperis is DENIED because Petitioner has not provided the Court with sufficient 23 information to determine his financial status. 24 A request to proceed in forma pauperis must include a completed affidavit with a 25 statement of all assets showing an inability to pay the $5.00 filing fee. See S.D.Cal. CivLR 26 3.2. The Southern District of California has a standardized application to proceed IFP 27 which …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.