William H. Brandstatt v. Clark, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM H. BRANDSTATT, Case No. 1:21-cv-01600-KES-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

v. (ECF No. 33) CLARK, et al.,

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff William H. Brandstatt (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of counsel, filed on September 30, 2025. (ECF No. 33.) Plaintiff asserts that the screening order issued by the previously assigned magistrate judge found Plaintiff’s complaint full of error, forgetting the liberal interpretation of a pro se complaint. Plaintiff indicates that the Court cited the hours it took to read the complaint. Plaintiff admits that he has no legal training nor does he understand the law. (Id.) Plaintiff is informed that he does not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action, Rand v.…