Baraona

Durrell Anthony Puckett v. Baraona, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 10, 20251:21-cv-01448California918 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DURRELL ANTHONY PUCKETT, Case No. 1:21-cv-01448-KES-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

v. (ECF No. 144) BARAONA, et al.,

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Durrell Anthony Puckett (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s second amended complaint against: (1) Defendants Baraona, Burnitzki, Leos, Hernandez, and Diaz for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment; (2) Defendant Leos for sexual assault in violation of the Eighth Amendment; and (3) Defendants A. Ruiz, E. Ruiz, Meier, Gutierrez, Allison (Cronister), and Price for failure to protect in violation of the Eighth Amendment. This case is set for a pretrial conference on January 26, 2026, and for trial on March 10, 2026, before District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s renewed motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.