Macias

Tamisha Macias v. Papé D.W., Inc., et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 10, 20251:24-cv-01066California688 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TAMISHA MACIAS, Case No. 1:24-cv-01066-JLT-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ v. SECOND STIPULATED REQUEST TO

AMEND CASE MANAGEMENT DATES

PAPÉ D.W., INC., et al., (Docs. 12, 17, 24) Defendants. 16 Background Plaintiff Tamisha Macias (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action with the filing of a complaint on June 20, 2024, in the Superior Court of California, County of Kern, case number BCV-24-12076. (Doc. 1). Defendants Pape D.W., Inc. and Dakota Brice Booker (“Defendants”) removed the case to this Court on September 6, 2024. Id. Following a scheduling conference, on December 5, 2024, the Court entered the scheduling order setting forth discovery, motion and pretrial and trial dates and deadlines. (Doc. 12). On July 8, 2025, the Court granted in part the parties’ first stipulated request to amend case management dates. (Doc. 17). Pending before the Court is the parties’ second stipulated request…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.