Rivera
Nathaniel Rivera v. CortiCare Inc.; and Does 1 to 100, inclusive
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 NATHANIEL RIVERA, Case No.: 3:25-cv-01875-RBM-DEB
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED
v. MOTION TO DISMISS
PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED
CORTICARE INC.; and DOES 1 to 100,
COMPLAINT
inclusive, 13 Defendants. [Doc. 6] 14 15 On August 6, 2025, Defendant CortiCare, Inc. (“Defendant”) filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Nathaniel Rivera’s (“Plaintiff”) First Amended Complaint (“MTD”). (Doc. 6.) The MTD provided a noticed hearing date of September 8, 2025. (Id. at 1.)1 Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(e)(2), Plaintiff’s opposition to the MTD was due on August 25, 2025. See also The Hon. Ruth Bermudez Montenegro Civ. Chambers R. II.B.–C. On August 18, 2025, Plaintiff filed a document designated as an Opposition but the filing was not for this action. (See Doc. 7.) As Defendant notes, the document “is captioned for the related separate action pending before this Court, entitled Joenathan Rivera v. CortiCare, Inc., Case No.…