Prince Paul Raymond Williams v. California Department of Child Support Services, et al.

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 PRINCE PAUL RAYMOND WILLIAMS, No. 1:25-cv-00981 JLT EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

11 v. (Doc. 8) 12 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES, et al., 13 Defendants. 14

15 On August 22, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations 16 to deny Plaintiff’s ex parte application for a temporary restraining order and order to show cause 17 regarding preliminary injunction. (Doc. 8.) The Court served the findings and recommendations 18 on the Plaintiff and notified him that objections were due in 30 days. (Id. at 5.) The Court 19 advised him that his “failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver 20 of rights on appeal.” (Id. (citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014).) 21 Plaintiff did not file any objections, and the time to do so has passed. 22 According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court performed a de novo review of this 23 case. Having carefully reviewed the matter, the Court concludes the findings…