Brown

Bridgett Brown v. Johnson & Johnson; Elizabeth Dawson v. Johnson & Johnson

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 24, 20253:25-cv-04318California1,829 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BRIDGETT BROWN, Case No. 25-cv-04318-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. REMAND

JOHNSON & JOHNSON, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 37 Defendants.

12 ELIZABETH DAWSON, Related Case No. 25-cv-04630-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. REMAND

JOHNSON & JOHNSON, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 18 Defendants.

18 Plaintiff Bridgett Brown’s and Plaintiff Elizabeth Dawson’s motions to remand were heard before this Court on October 30, 2025. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments therein and those made at the hearing, as well as the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby grants the motions to remand, for the following reasons. BACKGROUND Brown and Dawson are related cases. Plaintiffs each filed suit in state court alleging they were prescribed medications that caused…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.