Haynes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL HENREID, No. 2:23-cv-2797-DJC-SCR Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RAYMOND NEAL HAYNES, DAVID SOTELO, and RICHARD SKAGGS, 15 Defendants. 16 17 On August 13, 2025, District Judge Calabretta adopted the undersigned’s Findings and Recommendations to grant Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) in this action (ECF Nos. 17, 19) and to award sanctions against Plaintiff in the amount of $10,000. ECF No. 44. Judgement was entered on September 8, 2025. ECF No. 47. Plaintiff now moves to amend the judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59. ECF No. 48. District Judge Calabretta referred Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend to the undersigned. ECF No. 49. While Plaintiff cites to provisions of Rule 59 concerning post-trial relief, ECF 48-1 at 1, the Court construes his motion to fall under Rule 59(e), which allows for a motion to amend a judgment. Amendment or alteration of judgment “is appropriate under Rule…