Gutzalenko

Ivan Gutzalenko, et al. v. City of Richmond, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20253:22-cv-02130California6,157 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IVAN GUTZALENKO, et al., Case No. 3:22-CV-02130

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE APPLICABILITY OF

v. MICRA

CITY OF RICHMOND, et al., Docket No. 116 Defendants.

I. INTRODUCTION This order concerns the applicability of the Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act (“MICRA”) to Plaintiffs’ assault and medical battery claim against Defendants American Medical Response West (“AMR West”) and paramedic Damon Richardson (collectively, the “Medical Defendants”). California Civil Code section 3333.2 (“section 3333.2”) sets a cap on the total amount of noneconomic damages a party can recover in suits against healthcare providers “based on professional negligence.” Cal. Civ. Code § 3333.2. Plaintiffs allege that MICRA’s cap on noneconomic damages is inapplicable because Mr. Richardson’s actions constituted an intentional tort. Plaintiffs’ Brief on Applicability of MICRA, at 3 (Dkt. 120). They argue that,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.