Broom

Jamisi Jermaine Calloway v. Ronald Broom, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 10, 20252:24-cv-02445California920 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JAMISI JERMAINE CALLOWAY, No. 2:24-cv-02445 SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER & FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

RONALD BROOM, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is incarcerated in state prison and proceeding pro se with this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated the action by filing a complaint on September 5, 2024 (ECF No. 1) and sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2). However, a review of court records shows that plaintiff is a “three strikes” litigant. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Calloway v. Nieves, No. 2:19-cv-1792 KJM CKD P, 2020 WL 6074593 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2020), report and recommendation adopted, No. 2:19-cv-1792 KJM CKD P, 2021 WL 217451 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2021). Plaintiff is therefore precluded from proceeding in forma pauperis in this action unless he is “under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The “imminent danger” exception applies at the time of filing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.