Singh
Markkis Porsche Sonier v. M. Singh, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARKKIS PORSCHE SONIER, No. 2:24-cv-02511 SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER M. SINGH, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is incarcerated in state prison and proceeding pro se with this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint is before the undersigned for screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. (ECF No. 1.) For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned finds that the complaint states a cognizable Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against defendant Singh and a cognizable Eighth Amendment sexual harassment claims against defendants Singh and Mendoza, but no other cognizable claims. Plaintiff will be given the option of proceeding on the complaint as screened or filing an amended complaint. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has requested leave to proceed without paying the full filing fee for this action, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 2.) He has submitted a declaration showing…