Shteerman

Anna Mishina Shteerman v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 24, 20253:25-cv-03758California573 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANNA MISHINA SHTEERMAN, Case No. 25-cv-03758-RFL

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE SERVICE OF PROCESS

v. Re: Dkt. No.

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN

FRANCISCO, et al., Defendants.

Plaintiff Anna Shteerman, who is representing herself, was given until December 15, 2025 to complete service of process on Entity Defendants. (Dkt. No. 35.) On November 8, 2025, Shteerman submitted an affidavit and supporting documents stating that she served the summons, complaint, and the documents required under Civil Local Rule 4-2 on Entity Defendants via certified mail, return receipt requested. (Dkt. No. 36.) Rule 4(h) provides for two methods of service on domestic corporations, partnerships or associations. First, these types of entities may be served is “by delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to an officer, a managing or general agent, or any other agent authorized by appointment or by law to receive service of process.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(h)(1)(B). Second, they may be served, in accordance with Rule 4(e)(1), by following the law of the state where the district court is located or of the state where service is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.