Muza

The Ryzman Foundation Inc. v. Nana Muza, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20253:25-cv-09653California1,142 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 THE RYZMAN FOUNDATION INC., Case No. 25-cv-09653-MMC

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY

v. RESTRAINING ORDER; DIRECTING

DEFENDANTS TO SHOW CAUSE

NANA MUZA, et al., WHY PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

SHOULD NOT ISSUE; GRANTING

Defendants. REQUEST FOR EXPEDITED

DISCOVERY

11 Before the Court is plaintiff The Ryzman Foundation Inc.’s (“Ryzman”) “Ex Parte 12 Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause for Preliminary 13 Injunction; and Order for Expedited Discovery,” filed November 21, 2025. Having read 14 and considered the papers filed in support of the application, the Court rules as follows. 15 Ryzman’s claims are based on allegations that defendants obtained a $7.5 million 16 loan from Ryzman under false pretenses, the proceeds of which were wired to an 17 account at Bank of America, specifically, account number xxxxxxxx3581 (“Bank of 18 America Account”) and that defendants failed to make…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.