Miranda

Stanley W. Mundy v. Teauna Miranda

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 10, 20252:25-cv-01182California3,191 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STANLEY W. MUNDY, No. 2:25-cv-1182 AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE TEAUNA MIRANDA, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, paid the filing fee, and filed a motion for a stay and abeyance. ECF Nos. 6, 7. For the reasons discussed below, petitioner will be ordered to show cause why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). //// //// //// //// //// //// //// //// I. Background1 A. State Trial Proceedings On December 18, 2020, petitioner was convicted by a jury in Sacramento County Superior Court of four counts of lewd or lascivious act on a child (Cal. Pen. Code § 288(a)), two counts of lewd or lascivious acts on a child (Cal. Pen. Code § 288(b)(1)), three counts of rape (Cal. Pen. Code § 261(a)(2)), two counts of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.