Arvind Vyas Gopal v. Johnson, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 10, 20252:25-cv-01372California974 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARVIND VYAS GOPAL, 2:25-cv-1372-DAD-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JOHNSON, et al., Defendants.

17 Plaintiff Arvind Gopal, a state prisoner, proceeds without counsel under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and requests to proceed in forma pauperis. This matter was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff’s complaint fails to state a claim and must be dismissed. Plaintiff will have a chance to amend. I. In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff’s declaration in support of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The motion is granted. By separate order, plaintiff will be assessed an initial partial filing fee in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). The order will direct the appropriate agency to collect the initial partial filing fee from plaintiff’s trust account and forward it to the Clerk of the Court. Thereafter, plaintiff will…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.