Morrey Selck v. County of Sacramento, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MORREY SELCK, Case No. 2:25-cv-1761-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants, 16 On September 3, 2025, defendants filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s first amended complaint for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. ECF No. 13. To date, plaintiff has not responded to defendants’ motion. Under the court’s local rules, a responding party is required to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to a motion no later than fourteen days after the date it was filed. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(c). To manage its docket effectively, the court requires litigants to meet certain deadlines. The court may impose sanctions, including dismissing a case, for failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110; Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439,…