Laura Ramirez v. Wescom Credit Union

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 10, 20252:25-cv-01602California535 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAURA RAMIREZ, No. 2:25-cv-01602-TLN-SCR Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS WESCOM CREDIT UNION, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter, which is referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The record reflects that more than 90 days have passed since the filing of this action and no return/proof of service is on file, nor has any Defendant appeared. Additionally, Plaintiff did not respond to the Court’s Order to Show Cause (OSC) issued on September 16, 2025. Accordingly, the Court recommends that this action be dismissed for failure to effect service pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). I. Time Limit for Service Plaintiff filed this action on June 10, 2025. ECF No. 1. Summons issued on June 10, 2025. ECF No. 2. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(l) states that “proof of service must be made to the court.” Federal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.