Sue Ellen Holmstrand v. Mercy Housing of California, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 10, 20252:25-cv-02071California451 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SUE ELLEN HOLMSTRAND, No. 2:25-cv-02071-DAD-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS MERCY HOUSING OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff filed a pro se civil complaint and this matter was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). By order filed August 5, 2025 (ECF No. 3) the undersigned screened the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), advised plaintiff of the deficiencies in the complaint, dismissed the complaint with leave to amend, and granted plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff was warned that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The time granted for plaintiff to file an amended complaint has expired. Plaintiff has neither filed an amended complaint nor sought an extension of time to do so. In recommending this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute, the court has 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.